Monday, December 30, 2013

CNN’s Don Lemon Shreds ‘Smug’ MSNBC for Making Fun of Romney Family Photo Featuring Adopted Black Grandchild

 

CNN host Don Lemon is not giving MSNBC a pass for mocking Mitt Romney’s family photo, which featured his adopted black grandson. MSNBC host Melissa Harris-Perry and her panel apparently thought the black child being pictured alongside the white family was hysterical.

Lemon argued that there would have been plenty of outrage if Fox News hosts had put on the exact same segment and even slammed MSNBC as an echo chamber that doesn’t allow any kind of diversity in opinion.

“If someone on Fox [said], ‘one of these things is not like the other,’ to a black baby in a white family, what do you think would happen?” Lemon asked Marc Lamont Hill.

CNNs Don Lemon Shreds Smug MSNBC for Making Fun of Romney Family Photo

CNN

Hill argued that the MSNBC panel didn’t make fun the baby, but rather Romney and the Republican Party. He said it wasn’t the best joke, but also wasn’t “inappropriate.”

Lemon then set his sights on MSNBC as a network, saying former Mitt Romney adviser Stuart Stevens had a point when he called the network “a club where the smug go to exchange hateful opinions and reassure each other it’s acceptable.”

Though Hill had nothing but praise for Harris-Perry, even he admitted that “pockets” of MSNBC can sometimes be “smug and condescending.”

“But a bunch of people on the left who all agree with each other and there’s no diversity of opinion…and saying mean, smug things about people who may disagree with them,” Lemon pressed.

Watch the segment via CNN below:

Also, Mediaite’s Tommy Christopher chronicles some of the “apologies” the MSNBC panel made following the backlash the segment sparked, here.

 

CNN’s Don Lemon Shreds ‘Smug’ MSNBC for Making Fun of Romney Family Photo Featuring Adopted Black Grandchild
Jason Howerton
Tue, 31 Dec 2013 03:13:40 GMT

Watch the 2009 Video That Has Phil Robertson Under Fire Yet Again

To the assholes on the left, I say to you; When you start hollering about the prophet Mohammed marrying and bedding little bitty girls, then you can open your mouth about something else. Shut up already. You will never win against a Godly man!

Left-leaning bloggers have unearthed a 2009 video of embattled “Duck Dynasty” star Phil Robertson that they claim features him advising grown men to marry underage girls. We will lay out exactly what he said, along with the short video that is circulating, and let you decide for yourself if that’s what he is advocating or if there is more to his comments.

Duck Dynasty Star Phil Robertson Under Fire Over 2009 Video on Marriage at 15 or 16

This undated image released by A&E shows Phil Robertson from the popular series “Duck Dynasty.” Robertson was suspended for disparaging comments he made to GQ magazine about gay people but was reinstated by the network on Friday, Dec. 27. In a statement Friday, A&E said it decided to bring Robertson back to the reality series after discussions with the Robertson family and “numerous advocacy groups.” (AP Photo/A&E,)

During a Sportsmen’s Ministry retreat in Georgia back in 2009, Robertson starts by recalling a conversation he had with a young man who was dating a girl — but the two weren’t married. He says he provided the boy with some advice.

“Make sure that she can cook a meal. You need to eat some meals she cooks,” he said. “Make sure she carries her Bible — that will save you a lot of trouble down the road. And if she picks your ducks, now that’s a woman.”

He continued: “They got to where they’re getting hard to find. Mainly because these boys are waiting until they get to be about 20-years-old before they marry them. Look, you wait unit they get to be 20-years-old, the only picking that’s going to take place is your pocket. You gotta marry these girls when they are about 15 or 16 and they’ll pick your ducks.”

“You need to check with mom and dad about that of course,” Robertson advised. “The reason you Georgia boys can deer hunt, duck hunt, squirrel hunt, hog hunt, that’s the reason you can do it, what I’m holding in my hand right there. That’d be a Bible.”

While Robertson’s critics argue he was advising grown men to marry teenagers, others will say he was simply advising boys and girls to get married young. He married his own wife, Kay, when she was 16 and he was 20.

Further, he specifically references “these boys,” possibly indicating he was speaking directly to boys in the audience. The difference between the two statements is quite significant, though many media outlets reporting on the video don’t appear to be in a rush to confirm the context of the comments.

Those who watch “Duck Dynasty” also likely understand that there is often a dose of exaggerated humor in statements made by Robertson. But no one really knows for sure exactly what he meant, except for Robertson himself.

Because of the scrutiny already on Robertson, it’s likely he will address the remarks at some point and clarify them. Until then, speculation will run wild. Take our poll and let us know what you think:

Re-blogged from The Blaze

Watch the 2009 Video That Has Phil Robertson Under Fire Yet Again
Jason Howerton
Tue, 31 Dec 2013 05:06:18 GMT

What the NY Times Got Right and Wrong on Benghazi

 

The NY Times published a lengthy story by David Kirkpatrick Saturday which attempts to explain what took place last September 11th in Benghazi. Much of the story confirms things reported elsewhere, but the author comes to a different conclusion about two topics which have ongoing political implications: Who carried out the attack and why.

Kirkpatrick argues the attack was carried out by local militias not affiliated with Al Qaeda and that the film Innocence of Muslims played a significant role in fostering the attack.

The former claim has already been questioned on the basis of other reports--including one by the NY Times to which Kirkpatrick contributed--indicating that groups with connections to Al Qaeda were on site during the attack that night. Until the Times retracts or corrects its earlier reporting it seems to be at odds with itself on who was involved.

As for the claim that the film Innocence of Muslims was a motivating factor, Kirkpatrick writes "The attack does not appear to have been meticulously planned, but neither was it spontaneous or without warning signs." This conclusions was greeted as a new revelation by many but it perfectly echoes a conclusion reached here at Breitbart News 7 months ago:

There is some evidence...that people in Benghazi were aware of the video that night. And yet this is not proof that there was a spontaneous protest. There may have been a semi-spontaneous assault by militants, which is not quite the same thing.

To spell that out a bit more, some people who showed up that night were angry about the video. That anger may have been the edge the militants needed to keep friendly militias at bay. This first hand account published the day after the attack suggests there were "many people tried to persuade the Islamists to stop" but they held back out of fear of reprisals.

More importantly, the attack which took place on September 11th at the hands of extremists probably would have happened eventually even without the pretext of the film. Kirkpatrick goes through the list of some of the significant attacks which took place prior to the video every being seen in Africa. That list includes a prior attack on the US consulate, an RPG fired at the UK Ambassador's convoy, another fired at the Red Cross compound and an attack on the UN ambassador. (That pattern of attacks was also noted here at Breitbart a few days after the attack.) All of these previous attacks happened in Benghazi before anyone had heard about the video.

As for the politics which seem to frame the entire report, I argued in May that whether or not the attack was spontaneous, planned or something in-between, the Obama administration had a major failure on its hands.

Was this attack, then, a spontaneous reaction to a video or a planned attack? Either way, it was a major security failure. In fact, it's hard to say which horn of the dilemma would make the administration look worse. A planned attack means a failure of intelligence and security. A spontaneous attack suggests security was so lax, little planning was needed to overrun the compound.

To get even more specific, Hillary Clinton does not look a whole lot better for being caught unaware by a semi-spontaneous attack that took place after months of deteriorating security in Benghazi. The ball still got dropped and it happened on her watch. Nothing in the NY Times report changes that.

Re-blogged from Breitbart News

 

What the NY Times Got Right and Wrong on Benghazi
Tue, 31 Dec 2013 02:44:33 GMT

de Blasio May Save NYC's Carriage Horses by Slaughtering Them

 

Following through on a campaign promise, New York City Mayor-elect Bill de Blasio has pronounced the traditional horse drawn carriage industry in NYC's Central Park "over," claiming he will act quickly to end a practice he views as inhumane.

Unfortunately, as pointed out in the New York Post back in October, the move may result in the animals' slaughter.

There are more than 200 horses used in the city's carriage industry and their fate remains unknown as mayoral election approaches. It's possible the animals could be destroyed due to the expensive maintenance.

The animals' owners, carriage drivers and supporters of the old fashioned industry insist otherwise. Tourists are also said to be flocking to NYC for a horse drawn ride before the practice is extinguished, as it were. If dangerous streets are the problem, there's no telling when they may begin humanely putting down New York's many pedestrians as well at this point. 

De Blasio and advocacy groups who support him say it’s inhumane to make the horses work the dangerous city streets, but drivers insist their horses are well cared for and there’s no reason to end the industry.

Re-blogged from Breitbart News

de Blasio May Save NYC's Carriage Horses by Slaughtering Them
Tue, 31 Dec 2013 03:11:16 GMT

Monday, September 9, 2013

Assad Speaks: “Nobody Expected the 11th of September” - TIME


ABC News

Assad Speaks: “Nobody Expected the 11th of September”
TIME
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has remained largely out of public view since the Obama administration began lobbying for support of an airstrike to punish the regime for alleged use of sarin gas in violation of international law. Until now. In a wide-ranging ...
Looming Syria Vote Seen as Risk to Obama AgendasBloomberg
Uphill battle for Obama: Where Congress stands on SyriaUSA TODAY
CNN poll: Public against Syria strike resolutionCNN
Voice of America -BBC News -The Globe and Mail
all 1,968 news articles »

Assad Speaks: “Nobody Expected the 11th of September” - TIME
Mon, 09 Sep 2013 16:43:24 GMT

Syria 'welcomes' Russia proposal that Assad's government give up control of ... - Washington Post


Washington Post

Syria 'welcomes' Russia proposal that Assad's government give up control of ...
Washington Post
MOSCOW — The government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad on Monday said it welcomed a Russian proposal to avert U.S. military strikes by having Damascus turn over control of its chemical weapons to international monitors. The statement by ...
Syria 'Welcomes' Russian Call to Give Up Chemical WeaponsWall Street Journal
Syria says it "welcomes" Russian proposal to place chemical weapons under ...CBS News
Syria 'welcomes' proposal to put chem weapons under international controlCNN
Reuters -USA TODAY -BBC News
all 223 news articles »

Syria 'welcomes' Russia proposal that Assad's government give up control of ... - Washington Post
Mon, 09 Sep 2013 16:53:07 GMT

NSA accused of spying on Brazilian oil company Petrobras

Accusations that NSA is conducting intelligence-gathering operations that go beyond its core mission of national security

The US National Security Agency has been accused of spying on Brazil's biggest oil company, Petrobras, following the release of more files from US whistleblower Edward Snowden.

The latest disclosures, which aired on Brazil's Fantástico news program,

have led to accusations that the NSA is conducting intelligence-gathering operations that go beyond its core mission of national security – often cited as the key distinction between the agency and its counterparts in China and Russia.

The revelations are likely to further strain ties between the US and Brazil ahead of a planned state dinner for president Dilma Rousseff at the White House in October. Bileteral relations have already been muddled by the earlier release of NSA files showing the US agency intercepted Brazilian communications and spied on Rousseff and her aides.

Petrobras is the largest company in Brazil and one of the 30 biggest businesses in the world. Majority owned by the state, it is a major source of revenue for the government and is developing the biggest oil discoveries of this century, which are in a pre-salt region deep under the Atlantic.

Fantástico revealed a top secret NSA file – given by Snowden to Guardian journalist Glenn Greenwald – which shows Petrobras is among several targets for the agency's Blackpearl program, which extricates data from private networks.

Titled "Private Networks are Important", the slide names Petrobras along with the SWIFT Network for global bank transfers, the French foreign ministry and Google. Several other targets on the list, which may have links to terrorist organisations and other operations that potentially threaten the US, were redacted.

In a similar vein, it presented a "network exploitation" document from Britain's GCHQ, which works closely with the NSA, that affirms the importance of targetting companies in strategic industries. One slide, headed "Results – what do we find?", notes that private network traffic is collected from energy companies, financial organisations and airlines, as well as foreign governments.

But the TV report did not say when the alleged spying took place, what data might have been gathered or what exactly the agency may have been seeking.

Restating the surveillance and encryption-breaking techniques first reported in The Guardian and Washington Post, the program cast doubt on the NSA's claims to be focussing solely on national security with its use of malware and covert implants

Such techniques have also been used by Chinese hackers to acquire industrial and other secrets, but the NSA insists its goals are different.

"The department does ***not*** engage in economic espionage in any domain, including cyber," the agency said in an emailed response to a Washington Post story on the subject last month.

In a statement issued on Sunday night after the latest revelations aired in Brazil, the US director of national intelligence, James Clapper, said: "It is not a secret that the intelligence community collects information about economic and financial matters, and terrorist financing.

"We collect this information for many important reasons: for one, it could provide the United States and our allies early warning of international financial crises which could negatively impact the global economy. It also could provide insight into other countries' economic policy or behavior which could affect global markets."

But he again denied this amounted to industrial espionage. "What we do not do, as we have said many times, is use our foreign intelligence capabilities to steal the trade secrets of foreign companies on behalf of – or give intelligence we collect to – US companies to enhance their international competitiveness or increase their bottom line."

President Obama said last week that the US carefully limits its surveillance operations. "When it comes to intelligence gathering internationally, our focus is on counter terrorism, weapons of mass destruction, cybersecurity – core national interest of the United States," he said. "I can give assurances to the publics in Europe and around the world that we are not going around snooping at peoples emails or listening to phone calls. We are targetting very specifically areas of concern."

However, several other documents released on Sunday suggest spying activities by the NSA potentially go beyond the scope of the agency's stated goals.

In the overview of another surveillance operation called Blarney, one slide provides a list of requirements that includes "economic" information as well as military, diplomatic, political and counter proliferation and counter terrorism data.

These documents were released on Brazil's Globo network following the broadcast by "Fantástico" – the country's most influential current affairs program.

The program included speculation by experts and former Petrobras directors on the industrial secrets that the US might want to acquire, including deep-sea drilling technology.

The presenters said the espionage posed questions about whether the information would be used to benefit the competitiveness of companies in the US and its close allies. The presenters noted that many top-secret US intelligence documents are categorised as FVEY (five eyes) relating to the national agencies entitled to see them: US, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

Petrobras has yet to respond to the report.

The report was made with the cooperation of Greenwald, who lives in Rio de Janeiro.

The previous week, he and Fantástico also released files showing the NSA monitored the phone calls and emails of Rousseff and her aides, as well as Mexico's president Enrique Peña Nieto.

In the wake of those revelations, Rousseff said her state visit to the US in October was in doubt.

"My trip to Washington depends on the political conditions to be created by President Obama," she told reporters on Friday after talking to the US president during the G20 summit in St Petersburg.

She said the US president had reassured her that he would investigate the espionage and provide her with a full explanation by Wednesday.

"As well as what has been published in the press, I want to know everything there is related to Brazil. Everything," Rousseff said

The former president of Brazil, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has also condemned the spying and insisted that the president of the United States should apologise to the world. He called effort to control global telecommunications a violation of national sovereignty.

Fears that the US – and its British ally – have used "national security" to justify infringements on individual rights were strengthened last month when Greenwald's partner, the Brazilian, David Miranda, was detained at London's Heathrow Airport under UK anti-terrorism laws, after the British government had consulted with the US.

This disquiet is likely to spread to new sectors of society with evidence that the NSA is targetting the state-run Brazilian company that has access to many of the country's most valuable natural assets.

Jonathan Watts

theguardian.com © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

NSA accused of spying on Brazilian oil company Petrobras
Jonathan Watts
Mon, 09 Sep 2013 16:00:58 GMT